Gov. Scott Walker Recall Revisited: Breaking Down the Vote
Use Patch's interactive tool to get detailed results on how area communities voted in the recall election.
- By Mark Maley
- Email the author
- June 14, 2012
This map shows which candidate carried each area municipality and the percentage of vote the winner received.
Robert Veierstahler
http://wauwatosa.patch.com/articles/gov-scott-walker-recall-revisited-breaking-down-the-vote/media_attachments/edit?upload_started=1368994786
asset[new_asset_attachment_attributes][to_id]
2268835
asset[new_asset_attachment_attributes][to_type]
Article
article[new_asset_attachment_attributes][user_id]
new_asset_attachment_attributes
How did area municipalities vote in the June 5 recall election between Republican Gov. Scott Walker and Democrat Tom Barrett?
Here's a breakdown of votes you won't find anywhere else — a look at who carried each of the 89 municipalities in Milwaukee, Waukesha, Ozaukee and Racine counties.
Use our interactive tool to search for detailed results for the entire metro area or just your hometown.
Thanks. We'll email you the next time we update this story.
Read More in Elections
Wauwatosa West Student Elected 'County Executive' at Badger Boys Statesmall_zoom
false
false
43.0303
-88.0671
43.1054
-87.9874
See More on Patch
- Walker a GOP Standout for Presidential Race, Political Scientist Says
- Incumbents Re-elected in State Supreme Court, Superintendent of Schools Races
- Election Preview: Milwaukee County Circuit Court (Branch 45)
- Fallone, Roggensack Race Could Shift Balance of Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Scott Walker for President in 2016?
Alfred
8:16 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
We would like your kind to move to Illinois Lyle, or maybe Cuba, you will be much happier.
George Mitchell
8:18 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
To measure the sincerity of Shorewood residents, they should have a referendum on merging the school district with MPS.
3393
8:42 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Well said George and that's a truly fabulous idea.
Ray Ray Johnson
8:43 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
It just goes to prove that a substantial percentage of black folk would vote for ANYONE who runs democrat, whether it's an empty suit, such as Tom Barret, or a communist president with contempt for main street business owners. It's the constituancy of those sold on being downtrodden, not realizing that they are buying brand-name loyalty instead of the product itself.
Bill Krzyzanek
10:29 am on Friday, June 15, 2012
Well put. I spent 4 of the last days before the election including election day travelling around the northside of milwaukee (my hometown) with a 4'x 8' Walker sign on the side of my van. I engaged a few residents that were willing to talk and they couldn't give me a reason for why they vote democrat or why the would vote for Barrett. I was asked more than once if I was a business owner. (I must be rich to want Walker) What prompted my bold rides thru the inner city was seeing two white guys in a Kia minivan planting Barrett signs on nearly every lawn on Sherman Blvd. This was followed by VOTE WALKER OUT signs the next week.
Tom K.
2:02 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012
Why are there two different scales on the map? For deep red, Walker needed to get 70% or more, but for Barrett to get deep blue, only 65% was required. It also looks like one step in the scale was left out for Walker.
Dicks Deli
11:53 am on Saturday, June 16, 2012
It's easy, Tom K., they even have to cheat to get a decent-looking defeat.
wfb51
8:29 am on Monday, June 18, 2012
I think that is strange, too.....
StaynConnected
4:19 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012
Nicely done, PATCH! Thanks for providing this information. I was out of town for the election (but voted before we left), and missed a lot of the details. It's interesting to see how folks voted on a community-by-community basis. Some of the differences are also kind of amazing.
Dicks Deli
10:25 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012
Ditto, StaynConnected. I was also OOT, but voted early, and the dead tree coverage was pretty slim. Patch filled in some valuable and interesting detail.