patching...
Update: Want to be a blogger for Wauwatosa Patch? Email james.price@patch.com
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What is ALEC's Role in Wisconsin Politics?

Critics say the national government-business organization has too much say in state politics here and elsewhere.

 

A little-known think tank called the American Legislative Exchange Council is getting some national attention for its involvement in Wisconsin politics. 

The conservative-backed organization is gaining attention for authoring legislation pushed through state Legislatures around the country, including here in Wisconsin. Rep. Robin Vos, a Republican who represents Caledonia, is an active member, and Gov. Scott Walker is a former member of the group. 

After conservatives recent successes in Wisconsin, liberals are working to raise ALEC's profile and make it an issue come election time. 

John Nichols, associate editor of The Capital Times and contributor to The Nation and In These Times, wrote "ALEC Exposed" for The Nation. The article was posted online July 12, and is appearing in the Aug. 1-8 issue of the liberal magazine. 

Nichols characterized ALEC as "a critical arm of the right-wing network of policy shops that, with infusions of corporate cash, has evolved to shape American politics." 

ALEC describes itself as the nation's "largest, non-partisan, individual public-private membership association of state legislators." Critics like Nichols say the group, which has legislators and corporate representatives working together on political issues, has a direct pipeline to push legislation through at the state level. 

In his piece for The Nation, Nichols said ALEC's priorities for 2011 "included bills to privatize education, break unions, deregulate major industries, pass voter ID laws and more."

Sound familiar? Walker is an alumnus of the group, Nichols reported.

Nichols reviewed leaked documents that showed what the group's model legislation looked like, and the investigation into them found that some passed legislation lifted text verbatim from the ALEC models. To see what came of the larger investigation into the leaked ALEC documents, click here.

Nichols spoke about ALEC with NPR's Terry Gross on the July 21 episode of her show, Fresh Air.

Nichols told Gross corporate members of ALEC have the ability to veto proposals and ideas they don't like, and because of the reach of the group, the legislation that comes out of ALEC gets introduced in many states. He gave one example from Tennessee, where a newspaper "found a bill where the second half of it was verbatim from the ALEC model bill." He said that wasn't always the case, but that "the core concepts are there."

Nichols also said ALEC was smart to focus on the state level, rather than trying to get involved in Washington.

"We live at the local and state level. That's where human beings come into contact more often than not," he told Fresh Air. "We live today in a country where there's a Washington obsession, particularly by the media but also by the political class. … And yet, in most areas, it's not Washington that dictates the outlines, the parameters of our life. … And so if you come in at the state government level, you have a much greater ability to define how you're going to operate."

Fresh Air also checked in with ALEC, through Louisiana State Rep. Noble Ellington, a Republican and the national chairman of ALEC. 

Ellington told Fresh Air that legislators—not corporations—approve the model legislation. "They (the corporations) don't have a vote. Legislators say [what is introduced]. … And then the legislators can introduce that legislation in [their] state."

He said while the working process "may not be transparent," because legislation is later taken by ALEC members to their respective state houses, the public does have a chance to give input and talk to their legislators "so I don't see how you can get more transparent than that."

He told Terry Gross that it is important to give corporations the chance to participate in the drafting process "partly because they're one of the ones who will be affected by it," but cautioned that they don't get final say over what comes out of ALEC as model legislation. 

When Gross asked him about ALEC's inclusion of business interests over the general public at the table, Ellington said that the legislators represent those interests.

In Racine County, Rep. Robin Vos (R-Rochester) and Sen. Van Wanggaard (R-Racine) have been linked with ALEC, as Caledonia Patch reported July 19. 

Wanggaard's press secretary compared ALEC with the National Conference of State Legislators, and in a commentary that ran in The Journal Times, Vos said this was "a made-up issue."

Want to read more about ALEC and its role in Wisconsin politics?

Related Topics: American Legislative Exchange Council, Robin Vos, Scott Walker, and Van Wanggaard

St. Swithin

1:21 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

This outrage over outside influence has always been pointless to me. OK, so Walker got strategy pointers from a national political group. Well, they seem to have worked so perhaps he was pretty smart there. Wisconsin is connected to the rest of the country. Of course groups outside Wisconsin want to swing things here in their favor so that it helps their cause in other states and the Capitol. I am interested in finding out who the players are, but that is so I can figure out their true motives and goals. The Koch brothers and ALEC can help Walker if they like. It just tells me that Walker's goals are probably aligned with theirs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tass Kandle

11:34 am on Sunday, July 31, 2011

There is a difference between "getting pointers" and being handed a pile of crooked laws and told to pass them without allowing any debate or time for the public to digest them.

You know its crooked but "its ok because if you are a republican".

Heather Rayne Geyer

1:35 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

It is all so sickening I can't even handle it. Its buying votes plain and simple. Since when is this acceptable? Now I know what some people bury their heads in the sand...to keep them from exploding.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Duane Michalski

9:47 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Is that what WEAC and SEIU and AFSCME...etc... do? Buy votes...i say yes, what say you?

Comment_arrow

Ima Hippee

7:10 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Heather,

Since when is this acceptable? This is from today's JS:

In the Milwaukee market, the biggest spender is We Are Wisconsin, a coalition of union groups with a huge amount of national union money to spend on the recall races. Journal Sentinel calculations put the group's spending at just over $1 million - a figure the group's spokesman, Kelly Steele, confirmed as "a damn good estimate."

Not all that money was spent on the Darling-Pasch race. We Are Wisconsin has been running ads attacking Jonathan Steitz, the Republican lawyer challenging Sen. Robert Wirch (D-Pleasant Prairie), and those account for $100,000 to $200,000 of that $1 million.

Wait, what?

Bewildered

1:44 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

And the unions don't? Just ask WEAC about their new $500,000 campaign of attack ads against conservatives. BOTH sides are playing dirty and I for one am sick of it and ignore them. By the way, Patch, owned by the Huffy Post is no better.IIndependent? I think not. Good thing most of the bloggers here are from the Peoples Republic Of Shorewood and have no influence on the rest of Dist 8 ! Isn'tanyone else fed up with the negastive campaigtning on BOTH sides? Time for "Adult Swim" all!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Duane Michalski

9:52 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Bewildered...if you go back and look at the majority of posts..there are only about 13 or so people. I just read these posts to get a reality check...how desperate can the socialists be. I can't even begin how many posts there are about "social justice"...right in line with arriana huffhuffhuffington the queen socialist in America. Kinda makes one wonder why ariana and nancy pelosi are bestest friends!

Andy

1:45 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

The job creators used to be hardworking men and women who lived with their own families in the same community as their employees. They had a personal vested interest in the health and vibrance of the local community and economy AS A WHOLE. Of course, they needed profit to stay in business. But they had personal benefit from re-investing some of that profit back into the company, the employees, the local community as a whole. They **EARNED** the respect of that community through hard work and seemed to care if they were regarded as "upstanding citizens" or not.

Using SC Johnson as an example- how is the recent use of cheap "temp" labor for their manufacturing operations affecting the new owners of the company, who no longer even live here? It doesn't hurt them at all. They never have to look their workers in the eye. But I would venture that it has harmed the local economy (and morale) pretty substantially. The removal of that layer of pay, health insurance, and retirement security has definitely hurt the local economy, and the local residents.

But why should the new owners care - they don't live here anymore. We are no longer their neighbors as well as employees - they have no personal stake.

There is a huge difference between impersonal organizations like ALEC, where life is a game and the score is kept in money - vs. the old style job creators we are nostalgic for. We need to be realistic about that, or our naievete will get us nowhere fast.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Duane Michalski

9:28 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Andy, what are you talking about??? S.C. Johnson has NOT been sold. The Johnson family still owns it. Before you make yourself look even more ridiculous...get your facts straight!! What an IDIOT!!!

Comment_arrow

PF

10:06 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

andy

by "new owners," im assuming you are referring to Diversey?

http://www.journaltimes.com/news/local/article_30e05802-8c6c-11e0-becd-001cc4c002e0.html

btw, diversey will lay off 57 employees effective september of this year.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/124921034.html

ike

1:57 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

The point of this is that ALEC is a NATIONAL movement. They do not have Wisconsin's interests in mind. Walker is running his administration based mainly on their policies, this shows what little interest he has in helping Wisconsites. Don't believe me, read this directly from ALEC's site. Warning, it's long so people not interested in the truth probably won't read it. After you read this, you'll see how thoughtless Walker's actions have been. I understand every politician follows national groups, but the extent to which this was followed is concerning.
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=State_Budget_Reform_Toolkit&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15218

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

2:00 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Ever consider that the Democratic party is a NATIONAL movement? By your thinking, they must not have Wisconsin's interests in mind...

Comment_arrow

ike

10:28 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

CowDung - Your interpretation of what I wrote is obviously wrong since I did not make a 'therefore' statement. Please re-read what I wrote and I'd appreciate it if you please stop misinterpreting my words to make yourself sound superior. I suggest that if you want to make a comment, don't base it on lousy interpretations.

G0vSWalker

2:28 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Project smartALEC is looking at the connections between Wisconsin state senators, ALEC, and campaign contributions. http://demaa.org/smartALEC

Reply

Chris Larsen

2:34 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

This has got to be one of the most one-sided, biased articles on outside influence I have ever read. I await with much anticipation your scathing inquiries into Move-on and the groups running adds against Steitz and Darling. Also looking at the huge amounts of dues spent by WEAC (it's all about the kids!) and AFLCIO/SEIU..

Reply
Comment_arrow

shawn

2:42 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

RIght on Chris. Apparently Waukesha patch is just another media chorus for the o-blamo side of politics. I believe they should change the name to Waukesha Huff or Waukesha Journal-Sentinal.

Comment_arrow

Quint Canard

3:03 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Does MoveOn or WEAC write model legislation in secret?

Comment_arrow

shawn

3:20 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

To Quint-the demorats certainly do!

Comment_arrow

shawn

3:28 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

If you need to ask quint, you need to put down the kook aid.

Comment_arrow

shawn

6:07 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Well evidently the kook aid that you are drinking has made you deaf and blind.
"We have to pass this bill so people can find out what's in it" Nancy Pelozi-DDDDD

Comment_arrow

Milwaukee Ironworkers

8:43 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

LOL - Steitz is a corporate lawyer working in Chicago who specializes in "Globalization". Sending jobs overseas.

Andy

2:39 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Agreed that BOTH sides stink. Politics has always had it's influence peddlers. But perhaps the difference is that they used to hear from responsible people. I suspect that twenty years ago, they heard from a very different crowd than the most vocal opinionators they hear today. MANY of us lean only slightly left or right of center, yet we get drawn into this finger pointing and "they did it first" type debates - even when we despise what "our own" side did first too. But the politicians and narrow outside interests are laughing all the way to the bank.

WEAC and ALEC members are probably all in the same backroom laughing together, at us, while we do their arguing and re-directing for them.

Poltiics has always had its backroom deals, but the elected officials at least used to recognized that they were affecting real life happenings with their shenanigans. A few blowhards kept the media busy, while the ADULTS quietly, in the background, made the real decisions and compromises and got things done. It worked ok.

ALEC is all about themselves, and again, they have no LOCAL vested interest or benefit. WEAC is being exposed for who they are. ALL of these organizations are in it for themselves, and no one but their own narrow self interest. When politicians forget that the outside intersts are just that - they are no longer using EACH OTHER. The "using" becomes one sided. Politicians used to be a little more street savvy. And we pay the price for trusting any one of them.

Reply

shawn

2:45 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

From Sara's profile-I generally lean more conservative but like to examine both sides of the issues and learn what the driving forces are behind any given decision.

Yeah right Sara. Both sides of the issue huh? Hardly so when you wrote the article suggesting Prosser should resign after he "choked" the demo-rat justice. What exactly is the status of that? Now this clap-trap. Just admit that you are another smoke and mirrors "seminar calling" Kool Aid drinker. Where's the article about Barry's interference with the supreme court election? No word on the national union goons invading the state? How one-sided. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME...Go get yourself some red balloons.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

8:21 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

The Waukesha Patch editor did not write this story, and thus, it is not a reflection of her personal views. This story was written by Janine Anderson, an associate editor with Patch, and shared across many different Patch sites.

If you feel the story leans too far one way and is not a balanced piece, then comment about that aspect of the story. Patch prides itself on representing the communities in which it exists and would be more than willing to publish a story about an equally influential liberal organization that has the same impact.

Comment_arrow

Joe K

2:35 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Fundraising through national organizations and copying & pasting legislation from corporate wish lists are not the same thing. Sorry.

Comment_arrow

PF

9:10 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

joe k:

reason i posted the link was that some bloggers brought campaign finance into the conversartion.

i am an independent.

both sides abuse campaign finance reform.

although there appears to be proof that alec has perhaps drafted legislation, do you honestly believe that liberals have not ever done this?

Comment_arrow

PF

12:17 pm on Saturday, July 30, 2011

joe k:

furthermore, perhaps fundraising and copying and pasting legislation are not literally the same.

but are they all that different?

for example: why does obama's health care law not include a public option? because health insurance lobbyists showered legislators with money to prevent it. perhaps the health insurance lobbyists did not write the legislation for pasting into the bill. this is because they did not have. the legislators ensured that it wouild read to the insurance companies likings.

for example, research former arkansas democratic senator blanche lincoln and why she changed her stance to not include a public option.....lots of money from blue cross.

Bewildered

2:47 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

its not if the attack ads stink or who is running them, its that they all stink! Enouigh, run on your merits and let the public decide

Reply

shawn

2:52 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

You bet the ads stink. The re-call elections were supposed to be ALL about the collective bargaining priveledges that the teachers refuse to forfeit. But yet, I have not seen one ad by a flea bagging run-away demorat regarding this exact issue. Hmmmmm, wonder why?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe K

2:59 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

They must not have the eloquence that you do.

Bren

4:30 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Once again we are looking at the unholy marriage of corporate interests and government. How disrespectful of democracy can some people be? And the legislator who couldn't even be bothered to rewrite his spoon-fed bill but cut-n-pasted it straight from the source? Shame.
To be fair, ALEC and its ilk wield far more power and influence than unions in today's world. If only they would use their influence to help our country instead of find ways to send jobs overseas and depress the wages here that remain. Time was, people could put aside their differences to serve their country. What's happening now isn't rational, unless you believe greed that greed is an addiction. Then it makes sense that like any junkie, some people will stop at nothing to get their next fix, to slake a need that never can be satisfied. And instead of resisting the greed-addicts, how many of our legislators are enabling their "habits" for the sake of campaign contributions and selling the rest of us out. When will it end? When every call center and manufacturing job is in the Third World? When no one in the lower 80% of income brackets has any disposable income left and even Chinese crap becomes too expensive? It will be frightening to see when this unpatriotic brand of addict goes into withdrawal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:45 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

According to the article, they did rewrite parts of the legislation, but why would that really matter anyhow?

Is your solution to outlaw the outsourcing of jobs and force wages to higher levels? How long do you think those businesses will last trying to sell products against a competitor that has a fraction of the labor costs?

Like it or not, outsourcing is going to continue until it is not advantageous economically or impractical logistically.

Comment_arrow

Duane Michalski

9:33 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Bren, is it an unholy marrige between WEAC and Sandy Pasch or Bob Wirch?

Andy

6:16 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Yes, and airbags were "too expensive and no one will be able to afford cars if we are required to put them in". And regulations reducing dumping of raw sewage and industrial waste (remember when Lake Erie caught fire?) were "too stringent and all industry would go out of business because there is no way that American ingenuity could possibly overcome something like this and make it better". Certainly, we could all look forward more cheerfully to our old age, if only we could go back to how it was 20 years ago, when it was much, much more cost effective to run a nursing home when "that's just how it is - bedsores and wet sheets, stinking rooms and no one notices if you fall".

"Outlawing" things is not the answer. But if those in charge cannot be relied upon to act responsibly, then some amount of regulation can make things better. For Everyone.

Nursing home standards - created jobs because people were needed to provide proper care. Requirement for airbags - created a whole new industry manufacturing and transporting those parts (and new ad revenue). Requiring toxic waste to be isolated and properly transported - Waste Management / Veolia have a pretty sound business model - job creation and retention in many ways. Someone is driving all those trucks. And buildng the landfills. And of course, the accountants who manage all that. Moderate regulation, phased in and based on principle, not politics, will often help the economy more than hurt it.

Reply

Huckleberry Dumbell

6:30 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Is this where the Waukesha Patch is politically? Really? Pretending that a magazine article by the associate editor of the Communist oops, I mean Capitol Times is a fair and balanced piece of investigative journalism and presenting this article here as "news"? Then releasing this "news article" to all the local Patches around Wisconsin in advance of the recall elections? Go see if the Shepherd is hiring.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe K

3:00 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

You should make ad hominem attacks against news sources that don't unflinchingly report news according to your personal worldview. You'd effectively discredit everything that they report.

Heather Rayne Geyer

6:53 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

She is writing an article about something that is all over the news. She is not giving her opinion and I have no idea where she stands politically. This is the topic and you all have your undies in a bunch because deep down you KNOW its wrong. You cant justify it without sounding like a heartless arse. So you attack the writer or Nichols or the publication. Do you think that we are to take your opinions seriously when you do little more than call names?? You call the CT communists....and I can't even write what I think of Fox. Are these annoying digs necessary? I realize it sends out a rush of endorphins as soon as you push SUBMIT. But come on, it doesn't last long and it makes you look silly.

I try to stay away from commenting here or anywhere about politics anymore because it is useless. Were over here and your over there. Our sides won't meet. We can see that in Washington. Our country has been split and sacrificed for money and power. And the whole thing makes me sick!! This back and forth will solve NOTHING. Your "side" is never going to think that taxes are good if it helps those in need. My side will never think we should become a government-less society. Our sensibilities and senses of right and wrong are diametrically opposite. And while discussion can be useful, entertaining or theraputic...the chance of someone (someone who takes the time to type out their opinion for strangers) changing their mind is nil. So why bother with snarky ribs and name calling?

Reply

Heather Rayne Geyer

7:00 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

When I said you know its wrong - I want to edit that...You dont know its wrong. I fully believe that you people (see, those little digs are nasty, right?) think it is perfectly ok for everyone to think only of themselves. You just dont want to verbally admit that you dont give a %^$# about anyone...that it is every man, woman, child and invalid for themselves. You know that our society is too politically correct for you to be honest about your feelings about poor people, black people, gay people, etc....so you make excuses for these people you secretly admire simply because they are holding down the very people you secretly despise.

Note - By YOU I mean people on your right winged, tea party, extremist side (I wont even say republican because this new take over is NOT republican)

There...now yell all you want...deny all you want...I am going back into my liberal hole full of kool aid so I can drown out all the BS...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

8:49 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

As someone who has followed and attended TEA (Taxed Enough Already) events, your last comment is a bit offensive. Painting with broadstokes such hateful, unfounded diatribes does nothing for the conversation. I respectfully disagree with you that TEA party associates don't care about anyone and I'll use myself as an example. I believe that liberals prop up those very people you say we despise to make them dependent on government to perpetuate their desire to make carrers out of being politicians. Holding them down in society so they rely soo much on government that they do not have the chance to become all they can be, and proof is the very words Obama uttered last Monday in his political speech to the nation. The liberal agenda has failedso much that the black population has Depression era unemployment because of promises that the government would save them. If we are all truly one people, as Dr. Martin Luther King brought to the forefront, there would be no need for races to be brought up in any conversation. Yet the liberals have consistantly raised race in almost everything they do, why; because they must honestly believe without government, blacks would have no chance to make it on their own. Sorry, that is the worst kind of racism; pity and exploitation. That is where beliefs differ. Most TEA party members are good, hard working conservatives that believe in personal freedom, indivuals own right to be less reliant on government, and the country spend too much.

Comment_arrow

PF

9:18 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

i have attended republican, democrat and tea party events.

republicans and democrats are forever engaged in bi-partisan disagreements.

tea party members are sick of both democrats and republicans. however, b/c tea party members tend to be fiscally conservative, democrats group them with republicans while republicanstry to partner with them.'

it was a big mistake for tea party members to allow themselves to seek political shelter from the republicans. now they have to be criticized with them by the democrats.

we need more than two parties in this country, and tea party members alignment with republicans defeats the whole purpose of why they came into existence.

as to what HRG has said about tea party members, i would consider it to be senseless stereotyping, the same type of sterotyping that she seems to deplore against liberals in some of her posts.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:01 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

I've said this on the Patch and even wrote in in one of my articles. If you want true finance reform, eliminate third party ads from all groups including coprporations, unions, political PAC's, and anyone other than the candidate. The only thing the candidate can talk about is him/her and not bash the other candidate. Limit $200 individual donations and make lobbying illegal. As someone who believes in the TEA party movement, as Republican leaning, I gravitate to this cause because it is the establishment that drives me nuts; both dem and GOP. I find the TEA party to be a refreshing breath of fresh air to the gamesmanship that continues between both parties and respect the independent views that lean Libertarian and fiscally conservative, which my former party seems to be finally getting again.

Comment_arrow

PF

10:21 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

term limits would help as well.

we have too many career politicians on the government teet who enable their prolonged stays via the out of control financing.

w/ further regard to financve, during the last pres election, most presidential hopefuls each received 400k from bankone. all repub and dem candicates got it, except for ron paul, since he really had no chance of winning anyway. so, when bankone needs their back scratched, it shall be done, even if to the detriment of the common man who cannot afford to make such donations. this is just a single example.

when election time comes around, especially on a federal level, i am usually presented with a repub and dem candidate, neither of whom i really agree with. i vote the lesser of two evils. bipartisanship nowhere on the constitution or any amendments thereto.

at one time, it perhaps benefitted the country as another "check or balance." now it hinders the country with stalemate.

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

10:28 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

PF- I think we are watching the beginning of a real 3rd party as establishment Republicans try to keep playing nice and come to some compromise. It is good to see that 22 Tea Party Reps seem to be seperating from the GOP in the Debt Limit debate. We elect people because of what they stand for, not for caving in. This is not to condemn All Republicans because Ryan, Vos, Walker and Wanggaard have always been fiscally conservative.

Comment_arrow

PF

11:01 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

as you likely know, dan bell wrote an opinion piece making fun of the republicans for embracing tea party members who later appear to break away from them.

i was uncomfortable when republicans began courting tea party members b/c i have always felt that it would be to the detriment of the tea party.

perhaps such republican support was needed for the TP to get there foot in the door and be elected.

now that they are in office, it is a good thing that they are breaking away. we need to break the bipartisan stranglehold on this country.

again, the TP leans conservative. if this makes liberals uneasy, then perhaps they can form another party too. anything to bring additional parties into the mix in an effort to at least get something accomplished for the people, not the politicians.

Comment_arrow

Bewildered

11:18 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Brian, at the end of your last post, I would replace " conservative" with "responsible". :)

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

11:26 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Bewildered - Yes I would add responsible. And PF, Dan Bell has absolutely no idea of which he writes. He has taken the liberal agenda and bought into it. It is interesting how he throws the garbage out but never defends it. I will be posting about the events this weekend on Speak Up Caledonia, but a little heads up, it is the Dems and the Republicans that look foolish.

Bewildered

9:39 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Heather, while I disagree wiith almost all your politics, I do so enjoy your writing and sarcasm !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe K

2:39 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

If you post this 6 more times people might forget that Republican candidates benefit from outside spending as well.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Heather Asiyanbi

8:10 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Thanks for posting that link ... definitely worth exploring. I have passed it on.

Comment_arrow

PF

9:11 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

joe k:

see my above reply.

both sides are guilty of this.

Jay Harvanek

5:20 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

As a blog or Op-Ed piece this article would be fine. As a news article it's a fail.

Reply

Bewildered

10:34 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

From today's Journal :

" in Milwaukee, the biggest ad spender is We Are Wisconsin, a coalition of union groups with a huge amount of national union money to spend on the recall elections".

Hmmm...." national union money" . Think Patch will run a story on this? I don't think so. Patch = Pasch

Reply

Lib Hater

11:18 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Why is it, now that the union thugs and flamming liberals have been exposed a conservative group comes along and is worst than the Devil. Scott Walker, history will prove, saved us from the BS being kicked around in other states and Washington. The credit cards are full America. The first step is to cut them up, and then REDUCE ALL YOUR SPENDING.

I happen to agree with 90% of what's be accomplished though, I think it could have been done with a might more finanse". We, as a Nation, our broke. We can either bit the bullet and fix it or get ready to bow to the Emperor of China instead of our Flag. Believe me, China is planning to take us over someday. Look at the air force progress, navy and weaponries. Wake up Flammers its time to live as a Nation like you have to keep your house!!!

Reply

Patriot

11:40 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

ALEC is a fine organization. ALEC was created because liberal activists, had built a network of idea mills at the state level across America; conservatives had to do the same. I recommend it, its work, and its staff to all people in America.

Reply

Lyle Ruble

11:52 am on Saturday, July 30, 2011

I don't really get it why so many are upset by this ALEC article. For those who look beyond the surface and do a significant amount of political research, this information comes as no surprise. ALEC has been around for quite some time and their influence has been growing. The only way to stop their influence and "play for pay" tactics is to replace their minions representing us in the state legislature.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark S

12:17 pm on Saturday, July 30, 2011

Yep Lyle, and there are no other organizations like them on your side. Well at least none that will be reported on this site.

You going to get this one deleted too?

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

12:48 pm on Saturday, July 30, 2011

@Mark S...Sorry Mark, but the Dems haven't been smart enough to put something together like ALEC. One thing about conservatives that liberals lack is the ability to focus and stay on task. The conservative grass roots movement began back in the 1960s when liberals had control of everything. During the Reagan years conservative grassroots really took off with attention to winning elections on school boards, local councils, etc. You conservatives have concentrated on building a solid base and moved up the food chain. Whereas, liberals have looked to big organizations and neglected the grassroots.

Mark, I don't know what you mean by getting deleted.

Leave a comment