With statewide recall petitions just posted Tuesday night, already new and confirmed reports of improprieties are coming in.
That’s right – validated instances of invalid signatures throughout the recall process. It didn't take long. I didn't figure it would.
Usually, I screen blocked calls. Not today. I had a gut feeling I should pick up. A Racine resident in Sen. Van Wanggaard's district, a volunteer petition verifier, was reviewing the searchable database of those who signed the senator's recall petition.
She couldn’t help but notice that three people listed on a document she was looking at were individuals she knew personally – and whom she knew for a fact are convicted felons.
She gave me the three names to confirm her statement for myself. And I did just that. Obviously, anyone who is forbidden to vote because of their criminal record should certainly be prohibited to sign a recall petition.
For now, I have asked my dedicated grassroots comrades to begin cross-checking Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) with every name on all petitions as they are made public.
And in just the past couple of hours, I've heard about a number of individual sheets containing the names of convicted felons, in one case as many as nine.
I'm asking petition verifiers to report these findings either to myself, my colleague Paris Procopis, or the Government Accountability Board. The Republican Party of Wisconsin will also be sent any names of such individuals of whom we become aware.
In residence but ineligible
But this poses a whole new dilemma. We in the anti-recall camp have talked a lot about out-of-state signers, made-up names like Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck, who need to be found out and weeded out.
But here are people who can give their true names and addresses as genuine Wisconsin and senate district residents – but who, because of their criminal pasts, must be ferreted out through checks of court records.
It gets incredibly complicated because by law:
State statute 304.078(3), reading: "If a person is disqualified from voting under s. 6.03 (1) (b), his or her right to vote is restored when he or she completes the term of imprisonment or probation for the crime that led to the disqualification."
The bold italics are mine. With multitudes of felons being released early under probation – or never imprisoned at all – the GAB is not willing, or says it is not able, to do the work of verifying that these people are in fact eligible to vote.
Fortunately, we have a small army of people who are willing to do that.
My initial thoughts were that in Racine alone, there must be an epic number of convicted felons. I wonder if, in the end, the recall forces will have enough valid signatures to even trigger a recall.
And I'm not just talking about Sen. Wanggaard. I'm pretty sure nearly everyone who signed a petition against the senator also signed one against Gov. Scott Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch. Our host of volunteers hasn't begun cross-checking over all three sets of documents, but I'm in no doubt of what we'll find.
Stay tuned. We will provide confirmed reports of those we find ineligible for any reason – not least because they are criminals.
_________________________________
To contact me to help, or with information, please e-mail me at noellelorraine@hotmail.com or Paris Procopis at pprocopis@gmail.com.
And for the record, what I state in my opinion piece was indeed checked for accuracy. Not that it was necessary.
Whether that is related to this article or not...I just wanted to mention that fact checking an opinion piece is far from ridiculous and really should be part of the process.
Opinions don't have to be based on facts, but they are much more credible if they are.
I also agree that it is statistically nearly impossible to find 9 felons on one form. Most forms average 5 signatures. Nine felons on the street all lined up at the same time? Not likely unless a prison van stopped at a roadside recall table. I do not understand how the State maintains the list of felons on paper or how often they update their system. I can't imagine why they would spend the money to do that under normal circumstances. I also agree it is unlikely to find enough fraud to disqualify the petition entirely. But I want to know the truth, is there 540,001 legit signatures or 999,999? Don't we all deserve to know that?
+25% of the sugnatures are challenged? Maybe the 1 million number isn't a slam dunk.... Is Misty Mourning?
I am just trying to rekindle an old FLAME with some gasoline and compressed air! Seiously I do not know what to believe anymore, much of the reporting could just be to sway public opinion and have no real basis.(both sides)
Not today--Thanks for playing.
If it's the same petition sheet appearing twice, that's an error at the GAB -- either scanning the same sheet twice by accident, or double-posting it. Less than a million is still more than 543,000. And it's a lot of people annoyed with our Governor.
One example.... here are 2 pages from Gov. Walkers........... this also happened in the Senator petitions......... one has to wonder why 'copies' are allowed and why the dems 'copied' and submitted them as originals. #151844+ 151845 exact copies
Here is a set from Gov. Walker's ...... #151844+ 151845 exact copies
Pages 4701-B and 4703 Pages 4705 is a copy of 1584. Even marked COPY
LOL http://webapps.wi.gov/sites/recall/Written%20Challenges/Senate%20District%2023/Moulton_%20%20Written%20Challenge%20of%20Senator%20Terry%20Moulton%20-%2010976147%20v%201.PDF
Try to reason this out...how could the police and correctional agencies operate if they didn't keep records of who they arrested and who was in their custody? Think about it. Schools have lists of students. Hospitals have lists of patients. Hotels have lists of guests. Businesses have lists of employees. Correctional facilities have lists of inmates.