Many Ron Paul supporters are angry with the fact that he did not get the nomination, and are prepared to cause irreparable harm to our nation just to prove a point – but at what cost?
Let me begin by saying that Mitt Romney was not my first choice; however, over the past weeks, he has far exceeded my expectations. Now, I can truly say that I am fully supporting Mitt Romney, not just voting against Obama.
Everyone knows of Ron Paul and his spirited passion for government reform, much of which I agree with. Out of all the candidates, he was the only one with the courage to say what really needed to be done to fix our financial woes.
However, we also know the reality: swift cuts, like the ones he wanted, would have been difficult to accomplish – would be very difficult, and his party knows it.
The problem with Ron Paul is not his beliefs, his age, or even his eccentric passion; it is his die-hard supporters. There is no way Ron Paul could have lost, right?
Well, that is wrong. He never, at any time, had the majority support in the GOP. This may be disappointing, but "the process is the process." Primary after primary, Ron Paul was behind in the polls. Sure, there were some rays of hope for Paul in some states, but never enough to obtain the nomination.
Ron Paul lost, GET OVER IT!
Like so many of the spoiled public employees of the past year, many Paul supporters are upset that they did not get their way. Now you are all saying that you will vote for a third party, or not vote at all. Are you serious? If you truly believe in what Ron Paul stands for, you will follow the lead of many Paul supporters and support Mitt Romney.
If choose not to do so? You were never truly a Ron Paul supporter and would never have actually voted for him in the general election; this is especially true for the anti-war supporters. You know who you are, own it.
Reality Check: A VOTE FOR ANYONE OTHER THAN MITT IS A VOTE FOR OBAMA. If we are to defeat Obama, we need to be unified in our effort. Nothing else matters.
You can bet that Obama's supporters will be out in great numbers (and multiple times) – it is a historical fact. Trust me, I like the idea of a strong third party; there may be time for that, but this is not that time.
A third party could easily swing the election toward Obama, but is it worth it? Remember, it has taken decades of progressivism to get where we are, so it will take years to undo all the damage.
First, we must stop the bleeding, then, mend the wound. Mitt Romney, along with conservative control of the House and Senate, will stop that bleeding.
It’s gut check time. Will you support moving closer to what Paul was fighting for, or will you continue this self-destructive progressive path we are on. This whole election can swing on 5 percent.
Are you willing to sacrifice the entire American experiment, all to prove some ideological point? It is all quite literally in your hands. Choose wisely.
That being said, again, it's obviously your right to do so. Personally, I think it's a mistake and a miscalculation regarding the value of your vote.
Votes are not wasted by voting for what you believe.in. What state you live in should have no bearing on how you view the federal government Whether I live in Wisconsin or Illinois or wherever, the federal elections are essentially the same except for the electoral college. Just because I live in a so-called battleground state does not change my contempt for the two major parties.
MSNBC is the most unprofessional bunch of hateful losers I've ever seen. They mock, insults and skew anyone who is not a far left wing limpdick liberal. For you to point the finger at fox, and use msnbc as an example of balance, shows that you are: a NOTHOUGHT BOY.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfAvQp-Uk5I
The Basics Profile Home Profile Photos Jean on Patch Comments More Stuff The Board Recently Why isn’t George W. Bush campaigning for Romney? Bush is ... Election 2012: Romney to ... -by Jean Hoffman Why isn’t George W. Bush campaigning for Romney? He is ... Don't Pay Paul to Rob Romney -by Jean Hoffman Why isn’t George W. Bush campaigning for Romney? He is ... Bill Clinton: Romney's ... -by Jean Hoffman Why isn’t George W. Bush campaigning for Romney? He is ... Mitt Romney Coming to ... -by Jean Hoffman Why isn’t George W. Bush campaigning for Romney? He is ... Joe Biden Coming to Lakewood -by Jean Hoffman VOTE EARLY!!! Save Time and Trouble -- Saturday is Final ... Obama-Romney Race Too Close... -by Jean Hoffman VOTE EARLY!!! Save Time and Trouble -- Saturday is Final ... Bill Clinton's St. Pete ... -by Jean Hoffman VOTE EARLY!!! Save Time and Trouble -- Saturday is Final ... Bill Clinton in St. Pete ...
(maybe, I forgot to welcome you on some other string where you cut/paste your spam) ....just visiting or do you plan on staying?
That's what it comes down to, Keith.
It doesn't take a profiler to see through you. Don't try to be something you are not!
The best I can tell from Gary Johnson's website, the objective seems to be "get 5% of the vote and they have to acknowledge us". That, and pushing Gary Johnson as some sort of charismatic, man's man. I looked at the positions on stuff and it does follow pretty much the conventional Libertarian platform, freshened up a bit. The hard sell we've been getting around here for the past couple of weeks needed to start about 9 months ago and needed to include, as I mentioned, something more attractive and interesting than trashing the two major parties. That could have been done w/o concerns about the national media covering the candidate. That's true "grassroots" work. "Grassroots" as it relates to the major parties is an oxymoron. Perhaps it was being done elsewhere. It's been non-existant here. Waiting 'til the last minute and banking on frustration and fatigue generated by endless carping between the two major parties as a catalyst for a last minute third party surge isn't a workable strategy. As for the election, I'm still pretty much convinced Obama is going to take it, for the same reason he took it first time around - and, again, with an assist from the Republicans via their VP selection - albeit not to the same degree as last time.
The most interesting conversation I ever had on Patch was a few months ago. This concerned the views of Hamilton, Madison and Jefferson with regards to the relationship between the federal government and the citizenry. Two Republicans, a Democrat and myself discussed the fundamental question of how much power should the federal government actually have. Mr. Brian Dey seemed to be the most knowledgeable of us, but all four of us contributed much in the varying viewpoints that exist today. I think people would do well to read all three of our Founding Fathers writings on this subject. Then we can all proceed to have a deeper understanding of one another's conclusions.