Police and Politics: Rallies, Protests in Past Year Ate Up Overtime, Caused Friction

Unexpected political activity hit police in the budget, leading chief to ask for a say on whether his department should have to pick up costs of political gatherings.


Awhile ago, Wauwatosa Patch asked the ranking Wauwatosa police officer in charge of operations to reflect on whether anything stood out in the past year in policing our city, and to get back to us.

Were there any crime trends, upturns, downturns, unusual cases – anything that had raised his eyebrows?

“I’ve given this some thought,” Capt. Jeff Sutter said. “In terms of crime-fighting, I’d have to say it was business as usual. Some bad people did some bad things, and we caught a lot of them.

“There’s only one area that stands out, and I hate to even bring it up: Politics.

“With the partisanship in the state government, on both sides, we got caught in the middle.

“And when there are protest rallies – we’re involved. We’ve never had to expend resources before like we have the past year on politics.”

State politics hits home in Tosa

Second perhaps only to Madison, Wauwatosa, home to Gov. Scott Walker, became a focal point for political speech.

So much so that Wauwatosa Police Chief Barry Weber has called for an ordinance change, to be voted on Tuesday night by the Common Council, to give him the authority to review and possibly deny permit requests for events that would require a expanded police presence if the organizers cannot demonstrate an ability to pay for it.

As a check on that authority, the ordinance includes an appeal process allowing the Common Council to overrule him.

The ordinance change is intended not to stifle political expression, Weber and City Attorney Alan Kesner said, but rather to determine when and whether the Police Department should be expected to pay for keeping the peace out of its limited overtime budget.

“It costs money,” Sutter said. “Big chunks of it.

“You have to be prepared for things to go south. Our department is not set up to throw a lot of people off our regular patrol and policing duties in the community for something like this. We have to plan for the worst even if it doesn’t happen.

“So we have to call in people and expend overtime. It eats up money.”

Police have to live on a budget

In his request to the council, Weber focused on the rally on Jan. 21, which cost the department $3,100 in overtime.

But that was not the only instance, by any means.

On Feb. 15, 2011, a rally against Gov. Scott Walker’s policies, centered on his private home on North 68th Street, caught the community by surprise, and police had to handle the affair “on shift” – costing no overtime but alarming commanders because of what might have happened had things “gone south.”

Ten days later, on Feb. 25, anti-Walker forces held a protest on highway overpasses. This time police had wind of it and expended $820 in overtime.

In March, more than 100 people showed up at City Hall to protest ratification of city contracts with its unions. Council members denied the contracts. No police overtime was expended then, but when the issue was scheduled to be brought back to the floor on April 19, it was clear that an even larger crowd might develop.

It did, with , and police spent $1,800 in overtime to protect the seat of city government.

After a quiet summer, in his home block on 68th Street. This time, police were alerted in advance, and so was the media, raising the possibility of counter-protesting. A police presence was deemed necessary, and the cost in overtime was $3,500.

In all, those rallies and protests cost less than $10,000, but that was on top of all other overtime the expects and plans for. None of it could have been predicted, and so all of it was unexpected and unbudgeted.

Keeping the peace, prepared for the worst

The fact that no arrests were made at any of the events does not change the way police see it.

Just before the Celebrate Walker rally at the Rotary Performance Pavilion, police Sgt. James Mastrocola told Patch that, “It isn’t the people holding the event. They’re 100 percent there for the same reason. And it isn’t 99 percent of any of the people who might be counter-protesting that event – they’re just having their say.

“But one or two people can start something, and it can get out of hand in a hurry. Our job is to keep the peace, so we have to be there.”

Almost as if Mastrocola had predicted it, just such a situation did develop at the pro-Walker rally on Jan. 21. Two anti-Walker protesters entered the rally surreptitiously and, in the middle of a speech, unfurled a banner in front of the stage that seemed to accuse the Walker administration of racism.

Surrounded by hundreds of their ideological opposites, they were almost asking for a fight, but they didn’t get it. Nonpartisan private security guards hired by the event organizers moved in to escort the two out.

Even then, things could have exploded, as one of the anti-Walker protesters who had charged racism in turn hurled a racial slur at a security guard who happened to be African-American.

Invective aimed at police in line of duty

Such ironies were not limited to organized events. Police lived with them every day, any day.

“The thing that stands out to me is how bitter the average person became,” Capt. Sutter said. “The officers on the street were subjected to just vehement abuse.

“I can’t tell you how many phone calls I fielded from both sides. And it didn’t matter what you said to either side – you were the bad guy. Either we were the union guys, or we were the union guys who were exempted (from collective bargaining restrictions).

“The height of it for me had to be the day we were in a tactical situation – an armed subject in a standoff – and there was myself, the chief, the SWAT commander and a tactical officer, and we were bent over a map on the hood of a car.

“Never mind that none of us is a member of the union – we get a citizen yelling at us, calling us ‘Union thugs standing around wasting the taxpayers’ money!’

"Direct quote. Right at the height of it.

“We’re not accustomed to Joe Blow Wauwatosa citizen talking to us that way. It didn’t matter what you told them, or explaining the law, either.

“This was not our usual customer.”

Dirk Gutzmiller March 20, 2012 at 03:41 PM
This blog was written as if free speech and the right to gather are negatives. Police need to uphold Constitutional rights even if they are displeased with the process. Democracy is messy, there are countries where protest events like this would never happen, and if they did, they would be dealt with by police/military violence. If someone gets too rowdy, trespasses, etc. the police have many statutes and ordinances to call on to make an arrest. No one was arrested! FREE speech, now you are going to make people pay for it? UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
CowDung March 20, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Do you really expect the police to work for free at these events? It seems reasonable for those who were responsible for the increased costs to pay at least a portion of it...
Taoist Crocodile March 20, 2012 at 07:48 PM
Send the bill to Scott Walker. Agree or disagree with his policies, it's his uncompromising approach that produced this situation.
James R Hoffa March 20, 2012 at 07:57 PM
Celebrate Walker had private security funded solely by the grassroots organizers of the rally and the on-site bake sale. They also took the responsibility of cleaning up after themselves. On the other hand, the anti-Walker protests weren't as considerate of the taxpayers, were they? The liberals never paid for security and rarely did they actually clean up after themselves, most of the time leaving their propaganda posters littered all over the ground! And yet, the article makes no mention of these clearly distinguishing facts! What need was there for a public funded police presence at Celebrate Walker? Did those officers just sit around, eat doughnuts, and collect overtime while the hired private security handled the only incident that occurred at the event? Fiscally responsible conservatives vs mooching liberals and yet the article tries to play both sides as being a contributing problem on police resources. What gives?
James R Hoffa March 20, 2012 at 08:02 PM
Send the bill to United Wisconsin, One Wisconsin Now, and the DPW. Agree or disagree with their ideologies, it's their year-long temper tantrum and unwillingness to accept the will of the majority that produced this situation.
Dirk Gutzmiller March 20, 2012 at 11:50 PM
@James Hoffa - You should consider going back to the Old Country, with a bit of help from a time machine to get to the right period of history for you. Germany, Communist Europe , etc.), the Balkans (e,g, Serbia). Wherever your innate desires for control, stability, and suppression of anyone that does not agree with your opinions of how sociopaths should reign. You are in America now, big mean guy. We do not want those oppressions here. Those oppresions are possible here, most of us know there is a thin line of civility that marginally protects of, from voices from the dark underside like you. I invite other readers to click on your name and see your other people-hating comments. You sir, are a throwback to what we do not want in America, with our Constitution, with our progessive heritage, with our fresh start in a free, open land. Let the people speak, or go back to your dark and sinister roots in a land acrss the sea that we fled from, or our ancestors did. Our genetic memory says to let you go to the land of your dreams, and leave us now.
Bucky March 21, 2012 at 12:04 AM
Applause ...
Dirk Gutzmiller March 21, 2012 at 12:06 AM
@Cowdung - What are the police doing, ignoring federal, state, and municipal statutes and ordinances? The police should arrest those that disturb the peace, trespass, and otherwise break the law. They have a job to do beyond politics. It sounds like the badge public servants are appearing beholden to their exemptor from public union bargaining laws. Is this a police state now, or a people state? Are the police now Walker's implicit stormtroopers? They need to do their civic job, not their political job. Arrest lawbreakers. Stop the donuts, get out there and get the litterers, the disturbers of the peace, etc. Prove that these voices you so despise are actually lawbreakers. No arrests were made. In other words, there were other motiviations for complaining.
Jim Price March 21, 2012 at 03:44 AM
Gee, I've been accused of everything, but never of being both even-handed and biased in the same breath. I don't know of anyone else who's reported all of the police overtime for the year for all political events (most of them sponsored by the left). Yet I'm at fault for not reporting what it cost to clean up after anti-Walker events? Last I remember, this story was based on the Police Department's overtime costs for protecting the peace, and I don't think they are charged with picking up trash. When the Department of Public Works or the Parks Division asks for an ordinance revision because of their costs for picking up litter, I'll let you know.
James R Hoffa March 21, 2012 at 04:29 AM
@Jim Price - This wasn't directed at you, but rather Sutter. Sorry if I didn't convey that properly. Your journalistic integrity is fully intact with Hoffa!
James R Hoffa March 21, 2012 at 04:39 AM
@Dirk Gutzmiller - Excuse me??? Do you even know who I am??? "Big mean guy" - you're joking, right? It's Hoffa baby - the real deal Holyfield! And I'm definitely no oppressor! By all means, please examine away my Patch history - but don't make a judgment until you've been exposed to the full picture! I'm like Nicholson's Hoffa, not Blake's Hoffa - please don't confuse us!
James R Hoffa March 21, 2012 at 04:55 AM
@Dirk Gutzmiller - The only reason that police are necessary at such functions is to respond to those who would elevate the exercise of their free speech beyond the confines of the law. Even in America, speech is limited to time, place, and manner restrictions, remember? No one was arrested, but that doesn't mean that they couldn't have been arrested for their law breaking activities. At the Madison Capitol protests, there were numerous violations of the littering, jay walking, and other infractions committed, correct? Are you suggesting that police should have been ticketing as many people as possible so that the paid fines would somehow provide the funding for their presence? Yeah, cause the segway guy, Jeremy Ryan, has really paid in full all of the fines that have been assessed against him, right? Not to mention that liberal DA's have consistently refused to prosecute those that have been arrested for political activity out of their own partisan motivations. And still, you somehow claim that law enforcement are "now Walker's implicit stormtroopers?" You've got to be kidding me! And you say that I'm the one that is 'oppressing' the spirit of our nation??? WOW!!! Try again!
Bucky March 22, 2012 at 01:46 AM
Holyfield ... Hoffa , I didn't know that you were African American.
Dirk Gutzmiller March 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM
@Hoffa baby - A Santorum loving ultraconservative with a claimed connection and obvious admiration to the mob pawn Hoffa, with an innercity Chicago past, proudly living in Holy someplace, sitting all day at your keyboard while it is beautiful outside, fascination with sex, especially other people's, etc. You are that dark, sinister character we hoped stayed in Europe when we left there, We came to this country because it promised freedom, openness, and fairness. Now we are in danger of slipping back into the control of dictators, corruption, genocide, and Rome. You can put on your cheery, bemused mask of the right wing clown when challenged, but you state opinions that remind me of the brownshirts supporting the many autocratic governments of Europe, now mostly fallen to at least some form of democracy. You are scary.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something