.

Recall Rematch: Record Voter Turnout Expected in High-Stakes Election

Experts talk about the impact of polling, fundraising and turnout in the state's first-ever gubernatorial recall election.

This Tuesday will not only mark Wisconsin's first gubernatorial recall election, it will also mark the end of the most high-profile, expensive and politically-polarizing race this state has ever seen.

Ever since Gov. Scott Walker unveiled his plans to eliminate most of the collective bargaining rights of public sector employees, the nation has turned its eyes to Wisconsin, of all places, as , 14 Democratic senators left the state to stop the bill, were waged against six Republican senators and two Democratic senators, the results of a highly-partisan judicial election between Joanne Kloppenburg and David Prosser were and , were collected to trigger this recall election – the ultimate "referendum on Scott Walker."

While the media has tried to handicap the election by analyzing television ads, pointing to various polls, dissecting the involvement of the national parties, comparing the grassroots effort on the ground and tallying up the amount of money collected by each side, the result of the recall election is ultimately going to come down to voters walking into their local polling place and checking off the candidate of their choice.

And the state's Government Accountability Board predicts Tuesday's recall election will draw more voters than any other governor's election in state history.

The GAB predicts 60 percent to 65 percent voter turnout, which would top the record-holding 52.4 percent turnout seen in the 1962 gubernatorial election. The predicted turnout would fall short of the 69.2 percent turnout seen in the 2008 presidential election, though.

"There's a lot of buzz out there," said John McAdams, assistant professor of political science at Marquette University. "This isn't like some April school board election. This is what we political scientists call a high-stimulus election: huge numbers of ads and huge amounts of participation."

Most polls favor Walker

A flurry of polls have been conducted since the primary election to try to predict the outcome of the election, and almost all of them show Walker leading Barrett.

A recently-released shows Walker leading Barrett by 7 percentage points. Democrats have taken issue with the sampling in the Marquette poll, pointing instead to a poll commissioned by the Greater Wisconsin Committee’s political fund that shows Walker and Barrett in a dead heat.

Another poll released Sunday night shows Walker with just a 3-point lead over Barrett. That poll was conducted by Public Policy Polling, which leans Democratic.

Marquette Professor Charles Franklin, who oversaw the Marquette poll, said 17 polls have been conducted by various groups since April 1. All but one have shown some advantage to Walker, and all but two are within the margin of error.

But even the recent Marquette poll had conducted most of its interviews before the first of the two debates had been held.

McAdams and Franklin both said they would have liked to have seen a new independent poll conducted after the two television debates. McAdams said he believes the race may have tightened as a result of the debates and as more information is unearthed about the continually-evolving plaguing the Walker campaign.

Friends in high places

While polls don't win elections, the perception of polls by others often affects how much help your candidate gets from their friends at the national party level, special interest groups and donors.

Walker has raised more than $30 million, mostly from out of state, since January 2011. Barrett has raised $3.9 million since joining the race on March 30. Walker got a head start on fundraising because he was able to raise unlimited funds from individuals while recall signatures were being collected.

In addition to the campaign fundraising, independent groups and special interest organizations have spent a total of $30.5 million, according to the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.

McAdams believes the national Democratic Party and other interest groups could have poured more money into the Barrett campaign if polls had predicted a rosier outcome. For example, he said, pro-union groups put their political weight into defeating a restrictive collective bargaining law in Ohio championed by Republican Gov. John Kasich. Ohio voters rejected the new law in a referendum.

In addition to fundraising dollars, national parties and interest groups can also throw their support behind candidates by lending their star power.

Political celebrities sometimes motivate voters to get out to the polls, which is why , former Sen. Russ Feingold and Rev. Jesse Jackson have appeared at Barrett campaign events and Walker has received campaign help from , and .

"Those kinds of appearances really energize campaign supporters and volunteers, and it earns you free media," McAdams said.

Outside of Clinton, McAdams said Barrett has not had as many high-profile visits from fellow Democrats, which he attributes to either a lack of enthusiasm by national Democratic Party officials or a number of ambitious Republican politicians volunteering to scratch Walker's back with a stump speech in hopes that he will somehow return the favor in the future. 

Turnout is key

Polls may be influential, but even pollsters like Franklin acknowledge that people — not polls — put politicians in office.

Both the Walker and Barrett campaigns are indeed scrapping for every last vote as they campaign all over the state in the days leading up to Election Day. The GAB predicts 500,000 to 700,000 new voters will cast their ballot in the recall election without having voted in the 2010 gubernatorial election, which means this election will be about getting those who already support your candidate to drive to their polling location.

"The question will be whether either party can capture the majority of those re-entering voters who weren’t voting eight months ago," Franklin said.

Polls also show only 3 percent to 4 percent of voters are undecided. Although the campaigns are focused on getting their engaged supporters out to the polls, the small number of undecided voters still have the attention of each of the campaigns.

"If the race has in fact tightened, a small number of people could tip the election one way or another," McAdams said. "It may only be a few thousand votes, but those votes are worth trying to get."

Part of the small number of undecided voters could be due to the long campaign season, which unofficially started when the first round of Senate recalls began. Even earlier than that, if you count the original 2010 election matchup.

"This is a campaign that’s been going on for close to two years," Franklin said. "Voters have had far more time to make up their minds about these particular candidates."

But isn't it possible that people are fatigued by all of the political news and they will stay home on Election Day?

Not according to McAdams. He said there is a common rule in political science that "politicization begets politicization." Voters absorb the news, become more engaged and then seek out information that reinforces their existing viewpoints.

"In terms of participation or engagement, they aren’t going to withdraw, they are going to be drawn in," he said.

This story was updated at 6:30 p.m. June 4 to reflect recent Barrett campaign events featuring Russ Feingold and Jesse Jackson.

The Anti-Alinsky June 07, 2012 at 02:35 AM
John, how could some one who is "imaginary" talk to you??? Have you been hallucinating again??? Lay off the pot!!!
John Wilson June 07, 2012 at 03:27 AM
@Greg I don't know if the Dems are insisting on a 10-1 margin in spending or not. I am using an 8-1+ margin myself, however this is not counting all the issue ads and spending that went directly to promote Walker, and did not go directly to the Walker campaign. I am not a spokesperson for the Dems... When I talked with Oblahma, he informed me that his lack of appearance in the state was a strategic decision; the exit polls bear out that it was a good decision, as, even though people voted for Walker, these same people stated that they would vote for Oblahma by a margin of 53%. In other words, they parsed the state election as one thing and the Presidential election as something else. Many of these folks simply did not like the idea of a "Recall Election" - PERIOD! Oblahma was wise beyond his years NOT to get involved in this state election, as it surely would have cost him votes from Wisconsinites in the Presidential election. Strategy here, nothing more; besides, Oblahma does not need WI to win term 2 right now! Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the head of the Dem Party and she controls the purse strings... I do not know how much $$$ she sent this way and that is an issue for the Dems. I do know that Oblahma is going to be very competitive here in Wisconsin and Willard probably has a Slim to nothing chance... and Slim has left town.
Greg June 07, 2012 at 03:50 AM
Democrats and math do not mix. They are people of feelings and emotion. Their feelings are hurt, and the only thing that they can fault is Governor Walkers financing the campaign to get it won. They are too emotional to look in the mirror and see that they were too cheap to fund Barrett. John, I think you are way off with 8:1, but if not, who cares. I know that if Barrett had $20 million more, he would have spent it. Nobody wins an election based on how few dollars were spent per vote, they win by getting more votes. Walker raised money, Walker spent money, Walker won the election.. done deal, no regrets.
CowDung June 07, 2012 at 02:08 PM
John Wilson: Your response to Tim's statement was that "even a hasty internet search will reveal that Walker got two-thirds of his total campaign contributions from out-of-state contributors.". You didn't question the size of the contributions at all. Instead, you stressed the point that 2/3 of the contributions came from out of state donors.
The Anti-Alinsky June 07, 2012 at 09:37 PM
The days of giving the Native Americans alcohol, shiny beads or small pox infected blankets were long gone by the founding of the Republican party or Conservatism. The irony of your statement is that the man who is considered the founder of the Democratic party, Andrew Jackson, didn't even pull stunts like that, he just took their land and sent them packing somewhere else. You should be ashamed of yourself, but I know your not!!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »