.

State Supreme Court Refuses to Take Up Voter ID Law

Having Voter ID in place for the November elections looks unlikely now that the state's highest court has refused to hear either of two cases where the law was ruled unconstitutional.

The state Supreme Court has refused to hear arguments about Voter ID because one case has yet to go through the appellate court.

This means come November, voters will not be required to show a photo ID before casting a ballot.

WisPolitics.com is reporting that justices issued two brief orders; one of which called state Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen's petition to jump over the appeals court as "premature."

According to a story on JSOnline.com, if they take up the case at all, justices would prefer to hear both cases at once.

Van Hollen issued a statement shortly after the decision was made public:

The Voter ID law protects the integrity of our elections.  Injunctions entered by circuit court judges, acting alone, have already kept this law from being applied in several important elections over the past year. 

I am very disappointed that the Supreme Court has failed to act by denying the motions to consolidate these actions, bypass the Court of Appeals, and stay the injunctions against the Voter ID law.

The result is that the injunctions against the Voter ID law remain in effect and will, in all likelihood, be in effect for the upcoming November elections.

Despite this setback, I continue to believe that the Voter ID law is constitutional and I will continue the battle to have the law upheld.

Dane County Circuit Court Judge Richard Neiss issued a permanent injunction in March. Less than a week later, Judge David Flanagan issued a temporary stop in answer to lawsuits filed by the Milwaukee NAACP and Voces de la Frontera, and at least two other groups.

In at the conclusion of the trial for the NAACP/Voces de la Frontera case.

Voters should remember, though, that some requirements of the law remain in place, such as requiring voters to sign a poll book and to live in the same district where they will cast their ballot for 28 consecutive days.

Mike in OC September 29, 2012 at 01:55 AM
just another ploy by the dems to control the vote..... bunch of thieves.... led by chris larson... when can we make dane county it's own separate country?
vocal local 1 September 29, 2012 at 10:16 AM
You’re all out in the cold. I don't have a problem with voter ID law IF our legislators would also pass mandatory voting requirements. Australia has mandatory voting requirements. Vote or pay a ticket or go to jail. The Republicans wish to pass voter ID requirements to prevent random voters from voting to their gain. We need to adopt mandatory voting requirements and then the silent majority will be heard as they will be forced to participate and the country will move forward. I'd also like to see term limits so that we don't have these career politicians feeding at the trough and doing nothing not even living in their districts as many currently are getting away with. Lots of fixes just that neither party wants to create an equal battlefield.
morninmist September 30, 2012 at 12:33 PM
ha ha.
John Wilson October 02, 2012 at 10:10 PM
The ever bloviating JRH announced several weeks ago that Mr. Van Hollen would prevail, he just knew it! This is (2) in the WRONG column as of this date. 1) ACA would be declared unconstitutional 2) Van Hollen would prevail with his “stay” Van Hollen issued a statement shortly after the decision was made public: "The Voter ID law protects the integrity of our elections. Injunctions entered by circuit court judges, acting alone, have already kept this law from being applied in several important elections over the past year. I am very disappointed that the Supreme Court has failed to act by denying the motions to consolidate these actions, bypass the Court of Appeals, and stay the injunctions against the Voter ID law." The result is that the injunctions against the Voter ID law remain in effect and will, in all likelihood, be in effect for the upcoming November elections. I wonder what will be (3), perhaps the election on November 6? In moving FORWARD, let us all keep our eyes and ears tuned to real voter fraud: THE REGISTRATION VOTER FRAUD in FLORIDA which the GOP PAID 3M for!
John Wilson October 02, 2012 at 10:16 PM
dpatric2 - How TRUE, how TRUE... Now, all you have to figure out is how to get a GOP person to LISTEN!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »