Village May Televise Sewers to Prepare for Private Lateral Program

The village will pay roughly $175,000, for inspections, but homeowners will likely have to pay for laterals to be lined or replaced.

As the first big step in addressing leaky private sewer laterals, a village committee is recommending engineers start televising sewer lines in the flood-prone southeastern portion of the village with the goal of learning which laterals need to be lined or replaced.

The program recommended by the Private Property Inflow and Infiltration Committee Wednesday night includes visual inspection and/or dye testing where permission is granted, or where legal, to investigate suspected clear water connections to the sanitary sewer.

Village engineers suggested the committee consider beginning the televising project in the area roughly bordered by Glendale Avenue on the south, Hampton Road on the north, Oakland Avenue on the east and Ardmore Avenue on the west, but commissioners suggested engineers look at incorporating the entire "basin 3" area, which extends further westward to Santa Monica Boulevard and north to Henry Clay Street. The basin includes about 390 homes. The inspection could begin as soon as this summer.

Village Engineer Dan Naze said the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District has prioritized improvements in that area because it was identified as poorly performing in the past. Additionally, the village conducted flow monitoring in this area last year, so this inspection would provide data on the effectiveness of tightening leaky laterals, as well as identify what volume of clear water can be identified as other sources of inflow and infiltration, including foundation drains.

READ: The PP/II Committee is also working on eliminating clear water from the sanitary sewer system by looking for downspouts that are directly connected into the ground and performing dye water testing.

Within the basin, there are some areas where no replacement or rehab work has been done, other areas where the main has been lined but no lateral work done and other areas where mains and laterals have been replaced in the right-of-way.

Village engineers originally estimated spending about $92,700 on the smaller 204-home project, but at the same $450-per-house rate, the new 390-home inspection project could come out to about $175,000. The village has roughly $180,000 in funds available from MMSD, and if that is depleted, the village expects to either pay for inspection through bonding or through a possible sewer utility district.

Once data is collected about leaks in the system, the village plans to front the money for lateral lining and replacement, and then assess the homeowner. The current village code does not allow the village to mandate complete lateral replacement, so an ordinance change would be required to implement any work plan for lateral lining or replacement.

The estimated cost to line or repair the leaky laterals in the area is roughly $6,100 per home, but village officials stress that number is very preliminary and no work plans have been bid out.

The commission's recommendation to move forward with the project is expected to be taken up at a Village Board meeting on Feb. 20.

Bob McBride February 04, 2012 at 05:21 PM
Thanks, Kevin. That makes sense. Frankly, my main concern was with getting hit with a big bill all that once for those who might not be able to absorb one.
Bob McBride February 04, 2012 at 05:28 PM
I agree it would be a good idea to attend the PP II meetings. I'll look around for the schedule.
Steve Nersesian February 22, 2012 at 02:17 AM
I read in the Milwaukee journal that the city of milwaukee received money from mmsd to fund lateral repair for about 400 houses in cooperspark
tom sherman April 05, 2012 at 04:50 PM
i urinate and defecate in holding tanks to wit plastic barrels. i have two manholes each within 350' of my house. i would like the right to refuse a lateral and dump my sewage in these manholes. ditto any other harmful chemical i would use (i use practically none). doing this is one of the main reasons i only use about a gallon of water/day. further i no longer have plumbing bills, or have to listen to water noise in the pipes. another advantage is i can move my" toilets" to any room in the house. there are many other advantages to what i am doing which i am not listing. do i have to conform to wha teveyrone else is doing because they are ignorant of this idea or would be too lazy to move tanks '350 every say 6 months?. why not let people have a choice?. i would be willing to discuss further details with village engineers or donahue associates
tom sherman April 05, 2012 at 05:04 PM
THIS IS A SUMMARY OF WHAT I SENT LAURI ROLLINGS. PER #2 ARE LATERALS THE ONLY ANSWER? To review what I have sent you previously: 1) a noise law idea allowing only 14 hours/week to cut your lawn, 2) a sewer system proposal that employs holding tanks which are transported from ones home when full to a few main lines to be emptied directly in a manhole and back again continuously.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »